'Democracy and Dissent: Theorizing Political Agency from Sites of Difference' - 2017 Oxford Graduate Political Theory Conference
For more information, please visit: https://oxfordpoliticaltheory.wordpress.com/
**Conference Schedule**
Friday, June 2
9 – 9:30 am | Manor Road Building Lobby
Registration + coffee & tea
* * * *
9:30 – 11 am | Seminar Room A
Panel 1: Emancipatory Possibilities under Late Capitalism
Discussant: Dr. Dan Butt (Oxford)
Helge Petersen (Glasgow) & Hannah Hecker (Goethe University Frankfurt)
“A Critique of Left-Wing Populism”
Leonardo Sias (Southampton)
**Conference Schedule**
Friday, June 2
9 – 9:30 am | Manor Road Building Lobby
Registration + coffee & tea
* * * *
9:30 – 11 am | Seminar Room A
Panel 1: Emancipatory Possibilities under Late Capitalism
Discussant: Dr. Dan Butt (Oxford)
Helge Petersen (Glasgow) & Hannah Hecker (Goethe University Frankfurt)
“A Critique of Left-Wing Populism”
Leonardo Sias (Southampton)
'Syria and the Battle of Ideas'
Ideological and political radicalisation in contemporary western democracies: Cross-theoretical and empirical perspectives
Political radicalism and extremism no longer constitute marginal phenomena in European societies and politics. The consecutive financial crises, the Eurozone crisis, the refugee crisis, religious terrorism and geopolitical uncertainties create a multifaceted setting that exacerbates insecurity, anxiety and fears among European citizens.
' "The Optician of Lampedusa" - Opening the World's Eyes to the Human Story Behind Mass Migration'
'The More Things Change: How Whites Maintain the Racial Status Quo in a Louisiana City'
‘Fake Sites and Fake News’
There’s no clear dividing line between bad journalism and what is often called “fake news”. It’s futile to expect regulators or tech companies to be able to make editorial judgments. But what we can determine easily is the “realness” of a site. Does it have a real-world address, phone number, WhoIs, named contributors – in short, a colophon or impressum. Furthermore, does it adopt basic procedures indicating fairness – does it ever publish apologies, corrections etc? These tests are binary and easy to automate – and would make life much harder for the peddlers of disinformation.