There is now a far more sophisticated understanding of the contested character of global order and of ‘non-western’ perspectives. Much work has been done to pluralize and relativize the study of IR, and to question a mainstream that is often unaware of the deeply western-centric character of its assumed historical narratives, its allegedly universal theoretical categories, and its political preoccupations. But where does this agenda go next?
There is now a far more sophisticated understanding of the contested character of global order and of ‘non-western’ perspectives. Much work has been done to pluralize and relativize the study of IR, and to question a mainstream that is often unaware of the deeply western-centric character of its assumed historical narratives, its allegedly universal theoretical categories, and its political preoccupations. But where does this agenda go next?
There is now a far more sophisticated understanding of the contested character of global order and of ‘non-western’ perspectives. Much work has been done to pluralize and relativize the study of IR, and to question a mainstream that is often unaware of the deeply western-centric character of its assumed historical narratives, its allegedly universal theoretical categories, and its political preoccupations. But where does this agenda go next?
There is now a far more sophisticated understanding of the contested character of global order and of ‘non-western’ perspectives. Much work has been done to pluralize and relativize the study of IR, and to question a mainstream that is often unaware of the deeply western-centric character of its assumed historical narratives, its allegedly universal theoretical categories, and its political preoccupations. But where does this agenda go next?
Conference in honour of the political philosopher David Miller.
Panel 1
Chair: Ashwini Vasanthakumar
Jonathan Quong: Miller’s Crossing
Anna Stilz: On Self-Determination
Panel 2
Chair: Cécile Fabre
Avia Pasternak: Mobs, Firms and Nations – a Critique of David Miller’s Account of Collective Responsibility
Alan Patten: Public Good Fairness
Panel 3
Chair: Simon Caney
Conference in honour of the political philosopher David Miller.
Panel 1
Chair: Ashwini Vasanthakumar
Jonathan Quong: Miller’s Crossing
Anna Stilz: On Self-Determination
Panel 2
Chair: Cécile Fabre
Avia Pasternak: Mobs, Firms and Nations – a Critique of David Miller’s Account of Collective Responsibility
Alan Patten: Public Good Fairness
Panel 3
Chair: Simon Caney
Conference in honour of the political philosopher David Miller.
Panel 1
Chair: Ashwini Vasanthakumar
Jonathan Quong: Miller’s Crossing
Anna Stilz: On Self-Determination
Panel 2
Chair: Cécile Fabre
Avia Pasternak: Mobs, Firms and Nations – a Critique of David Miller’s Account of Collective Responsibility
Alan Patten: Public Good Fairness
Panel 3
Chair: Simon Caney
Conference in honour of the political philosopher David Miller.
Panel 1
Chair: Ashwini Vasanthakumar
Jonathan Quong: Miller’s Crossing
Anna Stilz: On Self-Determination
Panel 2
Chair: Cécile Fabre
Avia Pasternak: Mobs, Firms and Nations – a Critique of David Miller’s Account of Collective Responsibility
Alan Patten: Public Good Fairness
Panel 3
Chair: Simon Caney
Conference in honour of the political philosopher David Miller.
Panel 1
Chair: Ashwini Vasanthakumar
Jonathan Quong: Miller’s Crossing
Anna Stilz: On Self-Determination
Panel 2
Chair: Cécile Fabre
Avia Pasternak: Mobs, Firms and Nations – a Critique of David Miller’s Account of Collective Responsibility
Alan Patten: Public Good Fairness
Panel 3
Chair: Simon Caney
