Classifying Citizens in Nationalist China during World War II, 1937-1945

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
This paper argues that the first phase of the Sino-Japanese War of 1937–1945 saw a significant change in the relationship between state and society in China, leading to a greater use of techniques of classification of the citizenry for purposes of welfare provision and mobilization through propaganda, methods until recently more associated with the Communists than with their Nationalist rivals.

1911: The Unanchored Revolution

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on
One hundred years after the 1911 Revolution (Xinhai Revolution) in China, its meaning continues to be highly contested. Paradoxically, the more time that passes, the less certain either political actors or scholars seem to be about the significance of 1911 for the path of Chinese revolutionary history.

Strauss and Esoteric Reading

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

(Chair: Dr Michael L. Frazer, Harvard)

Professor David Weinstein (Wake Forest/Leipzig): Using and Abusing the Canon
Professor James Connelly (Hull): The Biter Bit, The Writer Writ: Some Straussian Ironies

Finally, Professor Stanley Rosen (Boston) delivered his talk on Strausss Hermeneutics via video:

{flvremote}http://www.politics.ox.ac.uk/materials/podcasts/230911_Pol_of_Interp/RosenClip.flv{/flvremote}

Philosophy, Law & Interpretation

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

(Chair: Professor James Connelly, Hull)

Professor Al P. Martinich (Texas): Ideal Interpretation of Political Texts
Professor Terence Ball (Arizona): Lincolns Hermeneutics

This series of podcasts is taken from an interdisciplinary conference convened by Jens Olesen, held on 23 and 24 September 2011 in Seminar room A, Manor Road Building.

Postgraduate Student and Early Career Panel

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

(Chair: Dr James Martel, San Francisco)

Jens Olesen (Oxford) On Derridas Double Reading and the Politics of Deconstruction
Dr Charles Devellennes (Kent) Political Non-Methodology
JanaLee Cherneski (Oxford) Method and (Mis-)Application: Two Readings of Joseph Schumpeter
Dr Philipp von Wussow (Leipzig) Leo Strauss on Cultural and Political Writing

Deconstruction

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

(Chair: Professor Mark Bevir, Berkeley)

Professor Joshua Foa Dienstag (UCLA): Interpretation, Language and Authority
Dr Lasse Thomassen (London): Aporia: The End of Politics?
Dr James Martel (San Francisco): Hobbes and Spinoza on the Hebrew Republic and the Deconstruction of Sovereignty

This series of podcasts is taken from an interdisciplinary conference convened by Jens Olesen, held on 23 and 24 September 2011 in Seminar room A, Manor Road Building.

Feminist Interpretations

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

(Chair: Professor Lois McNay, Oxford)

Dr Elizabeth Frazer (Oxford): Feminism and Interpretivism Revisited
Professor Terrell Carver (Bristol): Feminist Curiosities and Gender Troubles: Power, Politics, Metaphor
Dr Pamela Anderson (Oxford): The Politics of Interpretation in French Feminist Philosophy

This series of podcasts is taken from an interdisciplinary conference convened by Jens Olesen, held on 23 and 24 September 2011 in Seminar room A, Manor Road Building.

Contextualist Approaches

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

(Chair: Professor Janet Coleman, LSE/NYU)

Professor Mark Bevir (Berkeley): The Contextual Approach: Then and Now
Professor John G. Gunnell (Albany/UC Davis): Challenging the Received View of Thought and Language: Wittgenstein on Intention, Interpretation, and Context
Dr Michael L. Frazer (Harvard): The Ethics of Interpretation in Political Theory and Intellectual History

Hermeneutics

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

(Chair: Dr Reidar Maliks, Oxford)

Dr Carsten Dutt (Heidelberg): On the Very Concept of Interpretation
Professor Dieter Teichert (Konstanz/Lucerne): Hermeneutics: the Political, Politics, and Political Science
Professor Jean Grondin (Montral): Are There Political Consequences of Hermeneutics? Impromptus on the Modest Political Competence of Philosophy
Professor Paul H. Fry (Yale): Gadamer vs. HirschAre There Consequences?

Subscribe to