Workshop co-hosted by the Latin American History Seminar and the African Studies Centre, OSGA; the Rothermere American Institute and the Middle East Centre, St Antony’s College

Programme

The following sessions will take place at the Nissan Lecture Theatre:

9.00 – WELCOMING REMARKS

9.05 – 10.30: SESSION 1
Studying Populism: 50 Years after Ionescu and Gellner
Hans-Jurgen Puhle, Goethe Institut Frankfurt
The Place of Populism in Ernest Gellner’s Oeuvre
David Gellner, All Souls, Oxford
Chair: Eduardo Posada-Carbó, LAC

How does AI interact with creativity? Join us for a fascinating panel discussion with mathematician Marcus du Sautoy, composer Emily Howard and Sarah Ellis, the RSC's Director of Digital Development.

Panellists: Marcus du Sautoy (Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science), Emily Howard (Professor of Composition, Royal Northern College of Music) and Sarah Ellis (Head of Digital Development, Royal Shakespeare Company).

Further events involving Emily Howard during Week 6 will be announced in due course.

Reuters Institute seminars “The business and practice of journalism”

The following seminars will be given at 2pm on Wednesdays. This week the seminar will take place in the Barclay Room.
Convenor: Meera Selva

Despite the importance of the worsening Sino-American relationship, the nature and scope of the threat remain poorly defined. Understanding the future of the Sino-American confrontation requires comprehending why China and the United States possess motivations for conflict. To address this, we explain the two causes of the Sino-American confrontation. First, the change in the balance of power in China’s favor. Second, the conflicting ideologies of the two states. We submit that the relationship is likely to become much worse due to increasing security competition.

Did the threat to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA) by President Trump and Congressional Republicans after the 2016 elections undermine the general public’s support for health reform and mobilize Republicans voters to favor the law’s termination? That was the Republican intent; the actual effects speak to a fundamental question in the study of policy feedback – namely, the influence of political developments and, specifically, policy threat on individuals.