Petra and Tom's research into comparable democracies has informed the UK Government's statutory review of the FTPA, which is scheduled to report its findings before the end of February 2021.
Their evidence suggests that fixed parliamentary terms generally work in delivering the broader, principled goals of the FTPA, such as increasing parliamentary stability (on average) and reducing the executive's power to time early elections in favour of their own party.
However, the Brexit process has placed intense strain on the UK’s constitutional rules governing executive-legislative relations, including the FTPA, and has brought to the fore some of the unintended consequences of the Act.
Reflecting on these challenges, the researchers suggest reform not repeal of the Act, recommending two areas of opportunity:
"A revised Act could be improved by providing parliament with greater control over the precise timing of early elections and over prorogation. In both areas, the UK’s current rules give the government a normatively undesirable, and internationally unusual, degree of power over parliament.
"A modified FTPA could address these issues, provide greater clarity and predictability, safeguard the role of parliament and prevent executive overreach."
Throughout their project, the two researchers have worked closely with policy makers, delivering their findings to multiple committees, including: