Cyril Foster Lecture 2025: 'How to End Wars: Pragmatic Approaches to Peacebuilding'
The Cyril Foster Lecture 2025:
“Authoritarianism, nationalism, centralization, demagogy: surely these are evils from which we may expect to be cured” - Alessandro Passerin D’Entrèves, 1947.
In 1947, Alessandro Passerin D’Entrèves gave his inaugural lecture as Serena Professor of Italian at the University of Oxford. A scholar and Italian resistance fighter, he delivered the lecture less than two years after the end of the second World War. Passerin D’Entrèves saw his appointment as a chance to “cement the bonds of friendship and mutual understanding between England and Italy”.
Nuclear terrorism remains a low probability, high consequence threat. Lack of access and capability will likely continue to inhibit most non-state-sponsored terrorism scenarios; and nuclear forensics, and the risk that a state-sponsor’s identity would be discovered, will likely inhibit proxy attacks. But several developments appear to be changing the nature of the threat. One of these is that non-state groups likely to be motivated to try to use radiological or improvised nuclear devices are changing and growing in number.
Annabelle Gouttebroze is a DPhil (PhD) candidate in International Relations at St Hilda's College. Her research explores how the private sector's role in the development and trade of dual-use technologies introduces security risks.
Tobias Gerber is an MSc student in Politics Research at Wolfson College, Oxford. His research interests centre on international security and foreign policy analysis, with a particular focus on how leaders shape decisions to use or threaten force.
I am a DPhil student in Politics (Comparative Government) focusing on the political economy of subnational government, examining inter-governmental arrangements and their implications on political and economic outcomes. It also concerns a cross-national comparison of fiscally centralised states, namely the UK, France, and China. I employ quantitative methods of causal inference and game theory, whereas my theoretic framework is intrinsically comparativist and historical institutionalist.