(joint work with Luis R. Martínez, U. Chicago)

Local landed elites are expected to oppose private property rights out of fear of losing traditional privileges in land tenure. In this paper, I advance a theory of property rights formation in contexts of low infrastructural power and relative land abundance. I contend that the exogenous abolition of labor-repressive arrangements encourages landed elites to adopt private property rights as a legal means to prevent free rural workers from having access to land and thus reduce the cost of labor.

Sign up to this mailing list to receive emails about OPT events and Zoom links for online sessions:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSehoD13cFQgnv1NQAO_T-mJTfog9pZii4DC9wm2FWn-x_zJsg/viewform

What is the relationship between Chinese International Relations (IR) scholars and China’s foreign policy? How do we study China’s foreign policy through the eyes of Chinese IR scholars? Although Chinese scholars are normally quoted as valuable sources in the study of Chinese foreign policy in general, there is no systematic study of China’s IR scholars per se. This talk will examine an emerging research program focusing on the study of Chinese international relations (IR) scholars, especially their internal debates, as a new venue to understand China’s foreign policy.

To receive the link please email sarah.bufkin@all-souls.ox.ac.uk to be added to the CTS mailing list

Discussant: Jan Eijking

Darkhan is a former fellow who is Digital Editor at RFE/RL's Kazakh service. He was arrested for his coverage of the protests earlier this year, and will talk to us about the current situation for journalists.

This series is an opportunity for DPIR DPhils to present their work in progress and gather feedback.

https://zoom.us/j/97023514597?pwd=c01kNms5b1JJQlR4c21zTitOOFhjZz09

The electoral success of right-wing populist parties is often attributed to disaffection among certain voters. But while economic explanations for this disaffection are theoretically clear and quantifiable, explanations centered on cultural factors offer more vague accounts that are harder to evaluate empirically. We address this problem by theoretically distinguishing between five different ``storylines'' about the cultural origins of populism, and then test them using extensive data from Europe and the United States.